Author Archives: howrad

NTX Bike Polo holds court, and you’re all invited

What brings Dentonites out into the blazing sun, once or twice per week, to ride in circles and chase a ball for 4 hours?  Bike polo.  I tried it, and I can’t help but continue playing.  You’re hearing this from a skeptic, now fully converted.  It’s so fun I didn’t stop to take pictures or footage till my third trip.

This hard court variant of bike polo originated in Seattle in the early 2000’s and has since spread to cities all over America, and espouses a serious DIY ethos.  You don’t buy a polo bike, you build it.  You don’t buy a polo mallet, you build it.  The funky looking solid disc front wheel?  Yep, that has a purpose. The plastic shield keeps the ball from passing through the spokes, and it could keep a mallet from lodging in the wheel and interfering.  Gears?  You only need one.  Bike-handling skills like track standing are put to good use in bike polo.  There are basic rules, though, which you should read before coming out to play.  Notice, there’s a helmet rule.  There’s good reason for that, as I’ve seen almost every single participant take a tumble.  It happens, so be prepared.

I love that bike polo takes place in the hearts of cities.  It’s totally DIY, improv, organic, and makes it own home wherever players can find.  There are no televised matches, big prizes, or sponsor banners.  This game is purely from the heart.  In most cities, polo games happen in parking lots/garages, tennis courts, etc.  We’re very fortunate to have an actual street hockey court in Denton, over in Denia park on the West side of town.  Denton Parks and Rec has approved the use, and we don’t play at night since the city won’t turn the lights on.  Lately NTXBP has been holding court from 5-9PM on Sundays, and some Thursday evenings as well.  Check the Facebook page for discussion of games.

Nate Lightfoot explains that he and Eric Uphoff first started trying to bring bike polo to Denton around Christmas of 2009.

Eric Uphoff and I knew a bunch of people who were interested in bike polo, but nobody took the initiative to get anything going. We assumed people wouldn’t want to play if they had to make their own mallets, either due to lack of resources or skill. Eric picked up a graphite golf club, some thick ABS plastic pipe, and he came over and we started making mallets.

Working at the Friends of the Family thrift store, Nate started collecting golf clubs on the cheap and made rudimentary mallets.  Within two months, he refined the design by using durable HDPE pipe scoured from a dumpster.  At the same time, their polo bikes started to take shape, and soon enough they had extras to loan to out-of-towners.

By the summer, NTX Bike Polo was drawing players and spectators from the DFW region, including some very welcome involvement from Dylan Holt of Lonestar Goldsprints.  This led to talks of hosting a polo tournament at the eminent Cyclesomatic festival in October.

On the future of NTX Bike Polo, Nate offers:

I would like to get a team together and travel to some of the tournaments around the US. We are talking with BFOC about having a big bike polo tournament during the Cyclesomatic event, and if everything goes according to plan, we could have players coming from all over the US and maybe even some of the canadian teams.  There is a world polo championship tournament every year and I would really love to make it out there someday, even if just to watch.

NTXBP Facebook page here.

Tagged ,

Kathryn Newton to address city council

On the agenda for tonight’s city council meeting, item 5.D.2.b shows a citizen report: “Kathryn Newton regarding cyclist and pedestrian safety and rights.”

If you’ll recall, Kathryn’s husband, Alex Newton, was hit by a car and then ticketed for “failure to yield”.

Although the council meeting starts at 6:30PM, the other agenda topics (including gas well ordinances) look fairly weighty and could take 3 or more hours to get through before Kathryn can speak.  Regardless, we’ll be there and looking forward to hearing her address the council.  This is only the second bike-related citizen report we’ve ever seen, so it’s a great one to spectate and show support for.

Facebook event here.

Tagged ,

Denton hires Safe Routes To School consultant

freese-logo

On June 15, 2010, Denton signed a $10,000, 2-month contract with engineering firm Freese & Nichols to prepare a new plan for a Safe Routes To School program at elementary and middle schools.

This plan will cite areas around each school that require attention for crossing of barriers and provision of sidewalks or other safety measures to encourage walking or bicycling to school for households within one mile of school.

In addition to interviewing each of the 20 elementary school administrators, the consultant will identify and prioritize the following barriers to walking and bicycle within one mile of the school:

  • Missing or insufficient walkways (sidewalks and paths)
  • No safe place to ride a bike to school
  • Crossing streets and intersections are difficult or dangerous (volumes, speeds, control)
  • A major roadway or expressway divides the school from residential areas
  • Walkways are not accessible to students with disabilities
  • Bike parking at school is missing, insufficient or non-secure
  • Public safety concerns (crime, violence)
  • School or local policies negatively impact pedestrians and bicyclists

This project is an undoubtedly good move for Denton, although we realize that plans can be ignored or require additional planning.  The real kicker is how the city will (or won’t) fund the final recommendations.  We hope that the final recommendations will include formation of an ongoing Safe Routes program for Denton and not just a one-time analysis.  The national Safe Routes website explains how to set up a successful program, and as you can read, it ties together folks from all parts of a community to work continuously towards improvement.

Did you notice that Krum recently received $1,000,000 in Safe Routes funding?  They must have applied for funding from the $54 million that Texas distributed this year for Safe Routes.  Let’s hope that this consulting plan gets us closer to applying for funds of our own, because I must admit, we weren’t expecting a Krum to lead the local mobility charge.  Like all those cities that applied for the $54 million in 2009, we need a shovel-ready plan.

Key players:

Frank Payne, city engineer, frank.payne@cityofdenton.com

Kevin St. Jacques, Freese & Nichols senior transportation planner, krs@freese.com

Tagged

Bicycle accident map

Readers from last year will remember that when Nick Magruder was seriously hit and run on Bonnie Brae, the Denton Police were not collecting bicycle accident stats at that time.  Naturally, we asked if they could, and they agreed to start keeping track of bicycle accidents.  The police gave us a raw spreadsheet of accident data, and we plugged in the data to Google Maps via www.batchgeo.com.  You can click on each dot and see the accident date and time, and “contributing factors”.  The descriptions are pretty vague, and we’d like to get accident reports with these, but this will do for now.

In 2009, we had 23 reported accidents.  The key word is “reported”, as cycling accidents are known to be greatly underreported.  Remember this number, 23, because it seems to be from first complete year in which we kept track.  Ideally we should see this number decrease as Denton’s population grows, more people ride (optimistically), and infrastructure and culture change.

Considering how many cyclists there are at UNT (~3,000), notice that there’s not a strong correlation to accident frequency around campus.

Here’s what we have so far, June 2008 to March 2010, and we’ll update this periodically:

Bicycle Accident Map

These stats will be fascinating to follow as ridership continues to increase, because cyclists are safer in numbers.  As NYC drastically added bicycle lanes, cycletracks, boulevards, etc, ridership went up, and injuries and fatalities went down.

NYC cycling - safety in numbers

Tagged ,

How can you help?

bike flower

As bicycling in Denton continues to explode, we’re often asked “what can I do to help?” Sure, there are city meetings, group rides, and other opportunities that you’d have to mark on a calendar. But really, the greatest help you can provide is far simpler:

Ride often, in normal clothes, to normal destinations.

Replace even one car trip a week.

Make it look fun and easy.

Carry stuff.

Tagged ,

Commission to discuss Ave C cycletrack removal

MUTCD sharrow symbol

The Avenue C bike lanes which UNT wanted to remove are up for discussion at tomorrow night’s Traffic Safety Commission meeting at City Hall in the council work room, 5:30PM. After outcry from concerned cyclists, UNT postponed the demolition, we met with the UNT College of Music, and now a new plan which includes sharrows on Ave C will be presented by city traffic engineers.

From the agenda for tomorrow night, behold:

Recently there has been some attention drawn to a section of Avenue C through the University of North Texas (UNT) campus. In 1987 the City of Denton added a raised section of pavement on the east side of Avenue C as part of a project intended to add a median to the street and narrow its cross section from Eagle Drive north to Mulberry Street in order to try to slow down traffic through campus. Avenue C was previously 56-feet from back of curb to back of curb (b/c to b/c). A 10’ section of striped paving identified as a bicycle lane was added on the east side of Avenue C along this distance and a 14-foot median was added. The northbound and southbound lanes are 15-feet in width from face of curb to face of curb.

The UNT has asked the City to remove a section of the raised pavement on Avenue C at the southeast corner of its intersection with Chestnut Street in order to install a “loading zone” adjacent to its Music Department. This “loading zone” is really a misnomer. It is not a commercial loading zone that is typically approved through Traffic Safety Commission per Ordinance 93-089. It is a section of street that is signed for No Parking, meaning that vehicles may stop temporarily to load or unload passengers, etc. as long as they do not exit the vehicle and leave it. It will not be striped for a loading zone, but will instead have a 6-inch dashed edge line extended from the end of the raised section north to the turn lane at Chestnut Street.

Southbound bicycles using the raised lane on the east side of Avenue C are placed in direct confrontation with vehicles turning right on any of the cross streets on campus and at Eagle Drive. This is an inherently unsafe installation; however, neither the City nor UNT have the funds to remove it in its entirety and change the configuration of Avenue C. For this reason, the City is installing bicycle “sharrows” (bicycle symbols with chevrons) in the lanes on each side of Avenue C and signage indicating that bicyclists are to share the road through the campus. This street has lower speeds by virtue of its configuration and speed limit, and the sharrow concept, while it has not been formally adopted by the City, is a recognized share-the-road marking that has been discussed with UNT for application in this case.
Tagged

Driver hits Denton cyclist, cyclist ticketed

photo credit: Gerald Torrance

After completing an early morning 30 mile ride last Sunday, Southridge resident Alex Newton did not expect to get hit by a car, lectured by a responding police officer, and ticketed for failure-to-yield, all in his own neighborhood.

I had just stopped beside the neighborhood swimming pool on Woodbrook at Hollyhill and was about to cross Hollyhill on my way home. I do not remember seeing anyone while I was at the stop sign or when I started off into the intersection, but as I was getting clipped into my pedals and back up to speed mid-way through the intersection I looked to my right and out of the blind corner I saw a red Corolla coming at me. I started to accelerate as much as possible and thought that I was through the intersection, but to my surprise, was hit on the right hand side of my rear wheel and derailleur by the front passenger fender of the Corolla. My bike skidded a few feet to the left, but I was able to get my foot out and catch myself without falling.

After catching his breath, Alex reports that the car driver (Johnny Miller) demanded to know what Alex was doing in the road and yelled “I am going to call the cops”.  Alex agreed that police involvement sounded ideal, so they waited for the first officer to arrive.  While waiting for police, the driver continued to yell at Alex.

Johnny began yelling from across the street that “you didn’t stop!” and “what were you doing in the street!” I replied that I had stopped and that I there was no one in the street when I crossed. He yelled that I was a liar and that said that he saw me not stop. I was confused; I asked him why then if he saw me didn’t he stop?  He yelled that I was a good liar but still a liar.

At this point, the situation descended further into chaos, as the first police officer arrived and berated Alex, accusing him of running the stop sign.  Officer Danny Steadham, #124, accused Alex of “cussing this gentleman”, until the police dispatch corrected Steadham and reported no cussing during the 911 call.  Then, the situation gets more surreal as the Steadham threatened to write Alex a ticket for running the stop sign, describing that cyclists need to be taught a lesson.

Danny then let me know that he was going to give me a citation for not failure to stop at the stop sign. I told the officer that I had stopped, but he cut me off to tell me about the 8 cyclists he had seen earlier that day run a stop sign and how he has been lenient in the past with cyclists,but that we have to learn to obey traffic rules. I told him that regardless I had stopped. The officer then yelled over to Johnny to ask how long he had lived here. Johnny replied 13 years. Danny then asked if he knew the turn well, and Johnny told him that he did. Danny then told me that if Johnny had lived here for 13 years and knew this intersection that he wouldn’t have speed through, that in fact you couldn’t make the corner that fast. He went on to explain that he had tried to see how fast he could make the same corner during calls and therefore the he could not have been speeding. He let me know that he was going to write me a citation for not stopping and continued to lecture me on the subject of bicycles obeying all the same traffic rules as any other vehicle. I again told him that I had stopped.

As the situation continued to worsen, Officer Steadham’s sergeant arrived and attempted to calm the scene.  In an attempt to clarify what the record would indicate, the sergeant recanted his understanding of the accident.

He copied down the make and model of the frame and said that this is how they were going to file the police report: I had stopped at the stop sign and then proceeded into the intersection not seeing the car, the corner is a blind one, and Johnny had a large front left pillar and mirror and that he had not seen me. Mind you I am not a small man, and I was wearing a bright orange jersey on a bright yellow bike.  The officers then proceeded to let me know that even though I had stopped, as I was still operating a vehicle and coming from a direction that did not have the right of way, that I would be getting a citation for failure to yield right of way at a stop controlled intersection. He said that it would have been the same if I would have been in a car. Even though I had stopped at the stop sign it was still my responsibility to be clear of the intersection before any other traffic arrived from the direction that had right of way. I said that this didn’t sound right and asked if someone that was already in the intersection had the right to finish crossing. The sergeant joined in and said “well yes, in some cases, but not in this one”.

From glancing at Texas Transportation Code 545.153, it appears that the officers could be correct regarding Alex’s failure to yield.  The state law clearly favors vehicles already in the roadway. This, to governor Rick Perry, is adequate protection under current laws.  And that is why Rick Perry vetoed SB 488, the Safe Passing ordinance, which aimed to protect pedestrians; highway construction and maintenance workers; tow truck operators; stranded motorists or passengers; people on horseback; bicyclists; motorcyclists; and moped riders. Because the veto was completely unexpected, some municipalities have taken it upon themselves to pass local ordinances declaring the same kinds of protection. Councilman Dalton Gregory penned an editorial in favor of Safe Passing in Denton, but we’ve seen no support from other council members so far.

Wondering whether a sign would change the law’s determination, Alex questions the officers.

I asked if there was a “Caution children” or “yield to pedestrians” sign if it would still be permissible for drivers to run over the children in the intersection. The officer said that these signs would only be a warning and would not change the fact that the driver with right of way had no responsibility; it was up to the child, or parent if the child was younger, to beware of traffic.

In this case, Transportation Code 552.003 requires vehicles to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks.  Further, state law requires drivers to “exercise due care” even without a crosswalk, according to 552.008.

Legal semantics aside, Alex supposes that this accident represents a danger to the neighborhood children, and he’s disappointed by the lack of empathy from the driver or police officers.

The strangest thing to me about the entire event is that nothing went as I would have expected. Of course I didn’t expect to get hit by a car, but then when I did, I expected the driver to feel some sense of responsibility or remorse not aggression and anger towards the victim. I expected that when the police arrived they would tend to the possibly injured cyclist and try to understand the situation instead of arriving with a defensive attitude for the driver and preconceived ideas on my behavior from earlier events. The last thing that I expected is that I would have received a citation for being an obstacle in the road while the driver that hit me was free to go. These things bother me at a deep level particularly because it was in our neighborhood only blocks from our house at a swimming pool that we thought would be great for our girls to walk to in the summers when they were older.

After looking at the Google Street View, I can’t help but think the ultra-wide roadway, the lack of a 4 way stop, lack of any pedestrian/children warning signs, and vehicle speed of the Corolla all add up to a perilous situation for pedestrians and cyclists.  Given the road curve, I question whether there’s sufficient line-of-sight to make this intersection safe for anyone.  I’ve swam at that pool, and that huge roadway could definitely use a crosswalk for children and parents to safely make it across.  Perhaps a 4-way stop and crosswalk are called for?  Alex’s accident should be seen as an opportunity to make a dangerous situation safer, especially since he survived unscathed.  There are plenty of lessons to be learned here for drivers, cyclists, police officers, pedestrians, and traffic engineers.  Let’s make this situation work towards a better future and not a bitter one.

Tagged ,

S Fort Worth to get new bike racks, the kind cyclists love

Kevin over at Fortworthology writes that Fort Worth South Inc, a nonprofit working to revitalize south Fort Worth, sought to increase and improve bicycle parking in their area.  They collaborated on a bicycle parking plan, just received approval from city council, and are now cleared to fund the plan with TIF (Tax Increment Financing) district money.

Ft Worth bike racks

What does this have to do with Denton, you ask?

One, they’re smartly installing staple racks, which cyclists love, and are VASTLY superior to the “cost-efficient” serpentine/wave racks you commonly see in Denton.  While wave racks are often touted as holding X number of bikes, you’ll never actually see that number of bikes on one because they all get stuck together.  Anyone who’s parked a bike at crowded UNT wave racks knows that all too well.

Two, they’re using TIF district money to, well, improve the district.  That’s how it works.  You improve an area, and the improvement hopefully brings gains that offset the cost of the improvements.  I bring this up because as the Dinerstein Corp just received approval to develop a $30,000,000 project on Fry St, which is said to bring in $600,000 in yearly tax revenue.  Think that could do amazing positive things to transform the neighborhood?  Yeah, me too.   I’m not saying it has to necessarily be a TIF, but we need to find ways to encourage and capture specific tax income and use it wisely, instead of the money flowing into centralized coffers and out to projects on the sprawling fringes of town.  Western Blvd by the airport = $10 million.  Planned S. Bonnie Brae expansion = $50 million (10 of which the city will pay).  Let’s focus a mere tiny, tiny, tiny amount in comparison towards the center of town where people already live.  Bike racks are cheap, y’all.

Tagged

Should Hinkle have a pedestrian lane instead of the parking lane?

Hinkle pedestrians

In the above photo taken on my work commute this morning, you can see a group of about ten seniors taking a stroll along Hinkle.  Notice there’s no sidewalk on either side of the road.  I’ve also encountered folks in wheelchairs who roll in the road here.

Since Hinkle is about to be restriped and was just re-signed, allow me to think out loud: “Pedestrians use the road.  Nobody parks here.  Can we make this a pedestrian lane and not a parking zone, as it’s now signed?”

In playing Devil’s advocate, I must wonder if AASHTO will even allow pedestrians to share a roadway?  If not, then I suspect a parking lane is the nearest compromise, since a no-parking zone would just make it easier for cars to drive in the lane.

If this is the nearest compromise, then an obvious conclusion is that Hinkle deserves a sidewalk.  With a proper sidewalk on both sides, the Hinkle lanes could be reconfigured or even dieted, and that unfolds a number of possibilities for buffered or physically separated facilities.

Tagged

City changes signs on Hinkle, plans immediate restriping

New signs on Hinkle

Hinkle lane has been confusing for years, if not decades.  The signage and lane striping confuses all: pedestrians, cyclists, drivers.  Developers have sought to remove it, a cyclist was killed on it decades ago, it’s a critical route between UNT and UNT Discovery Park (page 21), and cars drive and pass dangerously in the bike lane.

Hinkle is about to change.

I (Howard) have brought it up on the Traffic Safety Commission as a confusing situation needing clarification for all transit types.  Another commissioner concurred and sought clarification of the lane configuration.

Yesterday, I noticed the previous signs which read “keep left [cars]” and “keep right[bikes]” had changed to the new signs in the above photo.  City engineer Frank Payne explains that the city seeks to discourage cars from passing in the bike lane by defining two spaces: a 5′ lane for bicycles and an 8′ lane for parking.  As a two-phased approach, the reflective buttons will be remove, and the bike & parking lanes temporarily striped.  Eventually, he says the bike lane will grow to 6′ wide when the city can afford to resurface the street, which has been said to cost approximately $1,200,000.

Payne states “the purpose of the revised signs is to start the education process with the motorists as soon as possible in an attempt to get them to stop passing on the right and usurping the space for the bicycles.”  Payne also explains that if they had made the entire West side into a huge bike lane, they fear that cars would still drive and pass there.

I’m not sure if this will actually work, but I’m glad to see the engineers working on this and trying a solution.  The freshly defined bike lane will be a great improvement, since the old bike lane markings are worn away to almost nothing.  The parking lane is admittedly a bit odd, since there’s no demand for anyone to park there.  Honestly, I wonder if the neighborhood might like a pedestrian defined space there, since there’s no sidewalk for most of Hinkle, and I often encounter folks walking and using wheelchairs in this space.  Given the excess of road width, no demand for parking, and significant pedestrian and cycling needs, I’d like to see a separated or buffered facility here eventually.  Cars, buffer, bikes, pedestrians.  I ride Hinkle daily, and when I ride in the defined bike lane, cars seem very close, and I am very uncomfortable.

Tagged ,